Apple to meet Swiss Federal Railways over iPad iOS 6 Clock app icon

“Swiss national train operator SBB said Friday it is to meet Apple representatives after the tech giant used without agreement its famous clock design on a new application for iPad and iPhone,” AFP reports. “The clock was designed in 1944 by Swiss engineer Hans Hilfiker and remains the property of SBB. It is still used in SBB’s stations.”

“‘There’s been no agreement so far, we’re going to talk about it,’ SBB press spokeswoman Patricia Claivaz told AFP, adding that the rail firm’s lawyers had requested the meeting,” AFP reports. “Claivaz dismissed reports that the rail company was intent on demanding financial compensation from Apple as ‘speculation,’ adding that SBB did not intend to ‘upset them by asking for money.’”

AFP reports, “Instead, the railway spokeswoman said, SBB was proud that its Swiss-designed station clock face had been chosen ‘for 80 million iPads’ after realising that the iPad apparently reproduced the SBB clock design on one of its new apps iOS 6. ‘We’re rather proud that a brand as important as Apple is using our design, it’s already on show in exhibitions in places like New York,’ said Claivaz.”

Read more in the full article here.

Related article:
Swiss Federal Railways accuses Apple of copying its iconic railway clock – September 21, 2012

Google nets a victory over Oracle in Android patent infringement lawsuit

Bloomberg has reported that a federal jury- in the 2nd phase associated with an intellectual-property trial- has found in which Google didn’t infringe on patents placed by Oracle. On June 12, The year of 2010, Oracle had charged Google for copyright and certain infringement more than Mountain View’s enactment of the Java-like Dalvik digital machine, the key technology utilized by the Google android operating system. Describes of the test, which wrapped up May Several, dealt with whether Google had infringed with Oracle’s copyrights. A court found that they, but ended up deadlocked on if thez infringement constituted truthful use. Upon Wednesday, the next part of the trial run wrapped up which has a jury finding that Google did not infringe in any patents. For that reason, the third section of the trial, the place damages for your patent infringements would have been determined, won’t often be necessary.The net/net is that Google is now on the hook for any paltry $150,Thousand for two copyright laws infringements. For comparison as well as a little schadenfreude , Oracle experienced first described the value of the actual infringements worth just as much as $6B, proceeded to submit a fit at a $2.6B worth, and finally attended trial by using a $30M price tag. Of course, this may not be the end of it; however one would have got to question Oracle’s information of experiencing any more hips at this stage. Brian Love, an Intellectual House attorney questioned by Bloomberg, portions it up fairly succinctly “This case will be maybe similar to a around disaster to get Oracle”.

Hit the actual break to get a little more historical past on the Oracle/Sun/Java fable and the key reason why Oracle called “shenanigans” about Google.On August 20th, '09, Sun Microsystems -- the owner and also developer in the Java-branded suite with products- announced that this had applied for a ideal agreement having Oracle by which aforementioned would purchase Sun for $9.50 the share. Over the subsequent year, the offer would be embedded by throughout the world antitrust concerns as well as high-profile resignations. By the time the acquisition was entire, Sun acquired lost Caffeine creator James Gosling, the entire JRuby team, and most of that it is executive control team. Eric Schmidt received, of course, already been a key worker at Sun's rays, rising to enjoy the software giant as its lead designer before leaving inside late 90′s, sooner or later becoming Google’s CEO.Essentially of the case was Google’s utilization of the Dalvik Virtual Equipment. Google has referred to the DVM as a clean-room implementation of your Java code-based virtual machine, improved to make and implement byte code within the Android program. DVM uses a register-based architectural mastery, retrieving facts and rule from stashed values for the duration of execution. This kind of results in a decrease amount of guidance required to operate (but much less code body) when compared to the pack machine design used by a Java Personal Machine. Dalvik doesn't use Capuccino ME class your local library, opting instead to use your open-source Apache Harmony inclusion. Oracle’s beef seemed to be that they thought elements of Dalvik duplicated how the proprietary J2ME software interpreted in addition to executed the Java program code.